Talk:Caterpillar 789
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've requested the contributor who applied a {{prod}} to the article to comply with WP:BEFORE.
For what it is worth, not only didn't they comply with before, they did not inform me they applied the {{prod}}. Geo Swan (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I am glad you found some more sourcing. I don't think you can depend on prodders for due diligence in searching first or in notification of main authors--neither action is required, although perhaps it should be. Best to keep articles you care about on your watchlist. --Mark viking (talk) 16:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)